Comparing wireless options in medical devices with mainstream applications

February 11, 2015 OpenSystems Media

Of the available short-range wireless technologies, Bluetooth and Wi-Fi are the most adopted by medical device developers. This gives them both an opportunity to interact with a large number of existing devices and infrastructure. The table compares wireless use between medical applications and broad industrial use.


Click to enlarge

Wi-Fi is used for higher data rates and longer distances, but is more susceptible to co-existence issues. Bluetooth caters to lower data rates and shorter distances, but the technology is less affected by large amounts of RF transmission within close proximity. It can also result in longer battery life.

One key requirement of any wireless medium in the medical space is reliability. And some protocol stack software is more robust than others. Clarinox is one partner of many of the RTOS vendors due to its robust and reliable Bluetooth and Wi-Fi stacks. By supporting Clarinox stacks in the specific RTOS, the design experience is enhanced for medical device developers and it’s easier to attain a faster time to market.

Bluetooth capability that’s provided by the module or chip vendor will provide minimal standard functionality. But if you’re looking for faster pairing, maximized performance, faster data rates, and a larger range of applications, then a dedicated stack vendor is typically preferred.

Things that medical device developers need to consider when choosing a wireless technology include:

  • Range – different technologies offer different transmission ranges
  • Data rate – the amount of data to be transferred is key here
  • Battery life – assuming the device is battery operated, how much power is available?
  • Latency – how quick does the connection need to be?
  • Robustness – medical devices can’t afford frequent reboots
  • Wireless standards – if it’s important to interact with other devices, like phones or tablets, then a standard technology that’s included on those devices should be used
  • Regulations – regulations around the use of RF within some medical environments is controlled; the level of control may vary amongst different governing bodies
  • Coexistence – increased RF “traffic” increases the chance of interference; some technologies are more effected than other
  • Security – privacy and security of data concerns
  • Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) evaluation requirements –this is often needed for devices like active implantable cardiovascular devices that provide one or more therapies for bradycardia, tachycardia, and cardiac resynchronization

I believe that Clarinox is one Bluetooth provider that takes steps to enhance the wireless design process (beyond what the chip makers provide). The company recognized that the trend toward greater design complexity was an industry-wide issue. So it decided to produce software systems to alleviate the complexity burden for the embedded software engineer. The result is a suite of protocol stacks, middleware, software debug tools, and an Intelligent Design Environment called Jannal, which lets engineers rapidly develop embedded wireless devices without having to learn the entire underlying system architecture.

The company’s Koala EVM can help a designer get started. Based on an STM32F407, the Koala board has two wireless module interface sockets and provides support for Ethernet, an LCD, a camera, USB OTG, UART/CAN, and built-in JTAG.

Through Jannal, the engineer can access the ClarinoxBlue Bluetooth Classic and Bluetooth Low Energy protocol stacks as well as the Wi-Fi WLAN stack complete with Wi-Fi Direct. The Bluetooth and Wi-Fi stacks run together within the same framework, easing the integration burden when both technologies are included in the same design.

Note: A complete paper, “Wireless Protocols and Driver Interfaces Used by Medical Device Developers and Other Verticals” is available for free download at www.emdeddedforecast.com.

Jerry Krasner, Ph.D., MBA is Vice President of Embedded Market Forecasters and its parent company, American Technology International. A recognized authority with more than 30 years of embedded industry experience, Dr. Krasner has extensive clinical research and medical industrial experience, including the successful filing of over twenty 510k submissions. He earned BSEE and MSEE degrees from Washington University, a Ph.D. in Medical Physiology/Biophysics from Boston University and an MBA from Nichols College. He has been a visiting professor at the Universidad de Las Palmas (Spain) where he was recognized for his work in neurosciences and computer technology.

Dr. Jerry Krasner, Ph.D., MBA, Embedded Market Forecasters
Previous Article
Developer's choice of driver interfaces

I think you'll find some of the results of the 2014 EMF Survey of Embedded Developers (864 respondents) qui...

Next Article
Medical device developers need help navigating the FUD of OS vendors' "mission critical" claims

In a previous life, I built four medical companies and took two of them public (confession: I did personall...

×

Stay updated on healthcare-related topics with the Medical edition of our Embedded Daily newsletter

Subscribed! Look for 1st copy soon.
Error - something went wrong!