Comparing power design options

December 18, 2014 OpenSystems Media

After test and debug, board design can be as time consuming as it is important (See our Embedded Market survey for more on development times). We recently covered power supply design – an important part of any system. There are several methods to go about designing a board’s architecture, including discrete, a discrete/integrated combo, or module-based, as Felix Martinez of Intersil Corp. compared. GE Critical Power created an infographic to compare discrete with another modular method – their Point of Load (POL) modules. For time- and resource-constrained projects that have to be reliable and perform up to increasingly high standards, POL might be worth taking a look at.

Power Design Head to Head: Discrete vs GE Point of Load (POL) modules
Click to enlarge.

Monique DeVoe, Managing Editor
Previous Article
Edge Management System missing link in IoT chain?

Earlier this week, Wind River announced a new platform for Internet of Things (IoT) device management, the ...

Next Article
Processor core ups performance for embedded Linux apps

With a goal of providing better support for embedded Linux and other high-end operating systems, the Design...